Here's the quick and dirty (which will probably really turn out to be slow and painful):
Alabama wins out. In doing so, they beat Auburn (giving them 3 losses) and Georgia (giving them 2). Auburn and Georgia are eliminated.
Miami wins out. In doing so, they beat Clemson (giving them 2 losses). Now, while Clemson may have better wins and not terribly egregious losses, the committee has revamped the rules to place "special emphasis" on conference championships. Clemson won't have one. Bye-bye.
Oklahoma wins out. It doesn't eliminate anyone but takes away the committee having to decide between a 2 loss Sooner team and us. We lose any such comparison.
That leaves one spot open. If Ohio State beats Illinois, beats Michigan, and beats Wisconsin, we will be 11-2 and a conference champion and Wisconsin will be, at best, 12-1 and a non-champion with a head-to-head loss to Ohio State. Unlike last year, with the new guidelines, the 2-loss conference champ gets the advantage.
That leaves only Notre Dame in our way and without a conference championship, ND finishes 10-2, with the committee's last true impression of them as getting skunked by Miami. ND will be out.
There is an argument for Southern Cal who could win the Pac 12 and finish 11-2, but the fact that the committee had Ohio State leap over USC this week by 2 spots leads me to believe that OSU wins the comparison. Wins over Michigan and Wisconsin will be more impressive than wins over UCLA and Washington going forward.
On to Illinois - they are . . . not so good. If this was the Premier League, Illinois would already be relegated to the MAC. Matthew and I have been to each of the last 2 Illinois visits to the Shoe (2012 - Ohio State 52-22 and 2014 - Ohio State 55-14). In between those, Illinois lost at home to the Buckeyes 60-35, and in 2015, we beat them 28-3. Average margin of victory: 30. Average points scored by OSU: 49. Those Illini teams were arguably better than this year's version.
The Vegas line has crawled up to 41 with an over/under of 55. I'm not a math major but a score of 48-7 is needed just to create a push on both lines. That's a pretty tall order no matter how poorly the opposition is.
it's also Senior Day at the Shoe. It's tough to look at Senior Day performances when the opponent is Michigan, so I looked at Senior Day performances for our last home game before we go to Ann Arbor.
2015 - lost to Michigan State (+14) 14-17
2013 - def Indiana (+34.5) 42-14
2011 - lost to Penn State (+6.5) 14-20
2009 - def Iowa (+ 15.5) 27-24 (ot)
2007 - lost to Illinois (-15) 21-28
2005 - def Northwestern (+ 19.5) 48-7
2001 - lost to Illinois (- 1.5) 22-34
1999 - lost to Illinois 20-46
So that is 4-5 S/U and a nice 1-7-1 ATS.
I would be emotional playing my last game in Ohio Stadium. (Note - I was emotional my senior year watching my last game as a student - coincidentally a 7-12 loss to unranked Wisconsin when Ohio State was No. 3. Thanks, Earle). Maybe that is what the players feel. Maybe it's the fact that Michigan is coming up on the schedule. I don't know what it is but we rarely play well the week prior. So, while I expect Ohio State to win big, the history books (as well as the inconsistent performance of this year's team) tells me otherwise. So, if you are wagering, I think you need to take Illinois and the points. Actually, I think I would just stay away from this game altogether. Don't bet the spread, don't bet the over/under. Just save your money this week. But for purposes of pure fun, ignoring history and all else . . .
Schaef Says: Ohio State 58, Illinois 14.
P.S. I will be in Arizona next week so I do not know if I will have a Michigan preview or not. Apologies if I do not.


